Populist’s Playbook asked AI ChatGPT to write an evidence based article arguing both for and against Scottish Independence. Here is what it produced: first the case against…

Scottish Independence is a hotly debated topic that has been making headlines for years. While many argue that Scotland should break away from the United Kingdom and become an independent nation, the evidence shows that this would not be in the best interests of Scotland or its people.

First and foremost, independence would have significant economic consequences for Scotland. As a member of the UK, Scotland benefits from the economic stability and strong currency of the pound sterling. If Scotland were to become independent, it would have to establish its own currency, which would be a significant undertaking and could lead to economic instability.

Furthermore, Scotland currently benefits from being part of the UK’s single market, which allows for the free movement of goods, services, and people within the UK. If Scotland were to become independent, it would no longer be part of this market, which could lead to increased trade barriers and higher costs for businesses.

Additionally, Scotland receives significant funding from the UK government, which is used to support various sectors such as healthcare and education. If Scotland were to become independent, it would no longer receive this funding, which could lead to cuts to public services and a decrease in the quality of these services.

Moreover, independence would also have negative political implications for Scotland. As a member of the UK, Scotland has a strong voice within the government and is able to influence decision-making at the national level. If Scotland were to become independent, it would lose this voice and would have to negotiate its own agreements with other countries, which could be a time-consuming and challenging process.

Furthermore, independence would also create uncertainty for the people of Scotland. It is unclear what would happen to the rights and protections currently afforded to Scottish citizens as part of the UK, such as the right to live and work in any part of the UK.

Additionally, independence would also have significant implications for the United Kingdom as a whole. The UK is a strong and stable nation, and the loss of Scotland would weaken this position. It is also uncertain how the UK’s borders would be affected, as Scotland currently shares a land border with England.

In conclusion, the evidence shows that Scottish Independence is not in the best interests of Scotland or its people. It would have significant economic consequences, negative political implications, and create uncertainty for citizens. Instead of pursuing independence, it is in Scotland’s best interest to continue being a part of the United Kingdom and work together to address any issues or concerns.

And for balance: we also asked the AI to write in favour of Independence. Here is the case it made.

The idea of Scottish independence has been a topic of debate for many years, and with the recent resurgence of interest in the topic, it is worth examining the potential benefits of Scotland becoming an independent nation. While there are many different arguments for and against independence, the evidence suggests that there are compelling reasons why Scotland should be a separate country.

First and foremost, it is important to recognize that Scotland is a distinct nation with its own unique culture, history, and values. For centuries, Scotland has maintained a distinct identity, with its own language, customs, and traditions. This is evident in the country’s strong sense of national pride and its commitment to preserving its cultural heritage.

Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that Scottish independence would allow the country to better govern itself and take control of its own destiny. As a member of the United Kingdom, Scotland is subject to the policies and decisions of the UK government, which may not always align with the needs and interests of the Scottish people. An independent Scotland would have the ability to make its own decisions and chart its own course, giving the country greater control over its own affairs.

Additionally, independence would give Scotland the opportunity to forge its own economic policies, which could be tailored to the specific needs and goals of the Scottish economy. Currently, Scotland is subject to the economic policies of the UK government, which may not always be in the best interests of the Scottish people. By becoming an independent country, Scotland would have the ability to implement its own economic policies, which could be designed to promote economic growth and provide greater opportunities for the people of Scotland.

Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that independence would give Scotland the opportunity to strengthen its international relationships and play a greater role on the global stage. As a member of the United Kingdom, Scotland is often overshadowed by the other countries in the union, and its voice is not always heard in international forums. By becoming an independent country, Scotland would have the ability to establish its own diplomatic relationships and have a greater say in global affairs.

Finally, independence would allow Scotland to become a more inclusive and democratic society. Currently, the UK is a constitutional monarchy, with the monarch having a significant role in the country’s political system. In an independent Scotland, the country could choose to establish a more democratic and accountable government, with power being more evenly distributed among the people.

Which case did you find more convincing?